my current interest in straightforward modularity. i would like to push it towards more diversity in scale, so kind of recursion i suppose + some more sophisticated use of resulting symmetries. and then there is a very interesting question of using same shapes set but with material density as a variable. images above show assemblies of 4 different modules. should we call it soft brutalism? (thx Reiner)
last year exercise. bar for crazy Angewandte parties that somehow don’t take place anymore. inspired/generated by autonomous agents trajectories.
with Sille Pihlak
study of a changing facade pattern. building skin is meant to be its dynamic thermal mass [water-filled elastic containers]. process of thermal regulation [internal and external heat gains redistribution] becomes an important aspect of building form. would it be possible to generalize this approach?
renderings: 70’s comeback+zbigniew oksiuta‘s madness+digital error study
photos: physical model studies – flexible, bending tower, tensegrity structure inside of a concrete shell, facade.
pushing rhinoscript towards almost ridiculous performance:
1.input geometry[maya-made shape] gets voxelised
2.decisions about program distribution are made
3.internal organization is created upon the voxel structure
4.output of the system is a model with adjustable level of saturation
with Julian Fors and Jan Gronkiewicz
published in AD Exuberance
study of possible performances of a homogenous folded space. and then application: trying to inhabit the dinosaur-fish.
explanation of the procedure. shape-pointcloud-set operations-voxels-shape interpretation.
since voxelisation process is recursive in this case, there is an option to use oc-tree like addressing instead of sets.
i wouldn’t treat it to serious though…
